similar-ish situation to you just a little bit younger, i went for a pair of super comfortable soft shoes for most runs (brooks glycerin 19, can't recommend enough) and then just a "faster" pair, Skechers razor 3 plus. so one soft shoe that feels nice to run in and one that feels more fun and encouraging to go a bit quicker Clifton Vs Mach Key Differences. I will go through all of this in more detail, but for a very quick overview some key differences: Mach is a more responsive shoe. Mach is a lighter shoe. Clifton has more cushion for longer runs. Clifton will be a bit more stable. I’ve run in 2 Brooks and 1 Hoka’s. Brooks are solid, durable but nothing exciting at all. Basically felt like ā€œdecentā€ shoes all round. Hoka seems to feel more exciting to run in. The style is great but I have read and heard many durability issues. I’ve still in between 100-200mile range so there’s still good feel but I don’t Comfort & Balance. The Hoka Clifton 8 and the Brooks Ghost 14 both shoes excel in the race of comfort but in different ways. Whereas the Brooks Ghost 14 gives the user a softer and more plush feel. The Hoka Clifton 8 is more responsive and supportive. So naturally, Ghost 14 gives the feet all the comfort and flexibility. Look into that and give ā€˜em both a go. šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø people love Hoka but after a shift the overly squishy soles of them actually seemed to increase pain elsewhere for me. Brooks are another big one. Just try a few things out. Nobody is going to know what shoes will work better than you šŸ˜‰. Apprehensive-Soup947. The Brooks Caldera 6 is Brooks’ most cushioned trail shoe yet, thanks to a plush bed of nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 foam. The cushioned midsole reacts to your unique stride, while a wide platform and multidirectional lugs provide stability and traction. Our Fleet Feet reviewers tested Brooks’ latest creation on the trails and added it to Zndd7jp. First, Hoka is known for its marshmallow-soft cushioning, which seems to be the obvious choice when it comes to comparing Hoka vs. Brooks for standing all day. This cushioned feel can be especially beneficial in reducing impact on runs that are longer and more intense than usual. Similar Article: Hoka vs Brooks Compared. Main Differences between Altra and Hoka: Here is the list of main differences between Altra and Hoka: Hoka One One is a performance-oriented range of running shoes, whereas Altra One One is primarily focused on fit. Altra focuses on comfort, whereas Hoka is more focused on customized performance benefits. In conclusion, we can see that both shoes are better for different purposes. Hoka shoes are better for standing all day and plantar fasciitis, while Brooks is better for running and walking. You can choose one based on the features you like more and the usage purpose. I have worn different styles of both brands; nevertheless, both are great for Dont settle for just one Brook. Go for many :) jokes aside i tried some models of both and can say that Brooks is more durable but Hoka has more tech and quality in some aspects. Clifton is not the best hoka though in my opinion. Rincon is better in everyway if u want a daily trainer Brooks Caldera 5 vs. Brooks Caldera 6 (RTR Review) Jeff V: The 5 is a superb shoe, one of my favorites last year, but the 6 is an overall improvement, with the more airy and responsive Loft v3 midsole, improved traction and many will appreciate the more accommodating upper of the 6. Which is Better – Hoka Bondi Vs Brooks Ghost? The Hoka Bondi and Brooks Ghost are two of the most popular running shoes on the market. Both shoes offer cushioning and comfort, but they differ in other aspects. Weighing the pros and cons of each shoe can help you decide which one is better for you. The Hoka Bondi is the cushier of the two shoes.

hoka one one vs brooks